3 Feb
2009
3 Feb
'09
3:47 a.m.
Ray Rashif <schivmeister(a)gmail.com> writes:
LASH using jack1+dbus is indeed not good combination. But I doubt the
compilation problem is related to this.
Joel Roth <joelz(a)pobox.com> wrote:
Shouldn't
there be an '-I/usr/include' appearing above?
Yes, there should be nothing "local" in the Makefile if you do a search.
Most probably pkg-config isn't right, but this should not happen in Debian.
Paths aren't the problem here, though. Try:
./configure --prefix=/usr \
--without-jack-dbus
I've read there's a problem with jack1+dbus. Sorry I can't be of more
qualified help, but an e-mail to a Debian package maintainer, lash and jack
dev will definitely shed light. Could there be a JACK version problem? LASH expects
jack_version > 0.99, but the latest JACK I have is 0.116.
I had just hacked that part:
MISSING_REQUIRED=" JACK >= 0.1"
So you disabled a check against jack2. I think lash was working with
jack1 in dbus-less mode but I havent tested it much.
--
Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>