13 Jan
2015
13 Jan
'15
12:59 a.m.
~ Russell
On Jan 12, 2015, at 3:25 PM, Arnold Krille
<arnold(a)arnoldarts.de> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:10:09 -0800 Russell Hanaghan
<hanaghan.osaudio(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Agreed. If I did go wireless it would be with a dedicated router of my own. Hidden ssid,
etc.
I have a resident position at a local live venue
haunt doing live
sound. Nothing super fancy but we get a great variety of quality acts
thru there.
I need some more returns to the stage. Probably 2 for live monitors
and maybe a cpl for I ear mixes. Rather than going for wired
solutions, could u get the latency low enough on netjack to not be a
nuisance over wireless? I could also run a single cat 5e or 6 and gig
ports too I suppose. Easier than running 4 + shielded pair in this
particular instance. Have several older laptops laying about.
Isn't cat 5e "just" 4 shielded pairs? Might be worth a try to do a RJ45
to XLR stagebox ;-)
Other than that I wouldn't go the wireless route, shared medium is
always asking for extra trouble. Especially when you have an audience
of mobiles searching for the next wireless to connect to.
- Arnold
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user