20 Feb
2004
20 Feb
'04
1:32 p.m.
Pete Bessman <ninjadroid(a)ml1.net> wrote:
:} Alright. Just a suggestion. {Too much time spent in crits. I just assume
that when someone put something up that they want that sort of response.
I do hope you don't take offense at that sort of thing. {Strangely enough...
most folks response in crits is pretty similar to your own. As mine usually
is. If something's done enough to show... I'm usually so tired of it that I
never want to see it again.}}
RTaylor wrote:
My real
problem would be with the squeaky bits that you've got
going along with the massive guitar thrummy stuff. They just don't
seem to be part of the same song. I like the massive guitar thrummy
stuff... the other sounds throw me off. Maybe if you were to morph
between the two somehow or toss in a transitional sound?
That's a good premise on which to do a remix, but it would actually be
a bit too drastic of a change to make and still consider the song to
be the same. The dynamics of this song are intentionally raw and
dichotomous. As always, if you want to hack it up, have at it! And
I can guarantee
No thanks. I'm still not quite sure I agree with the concept of remixing. Most
of my samples began life as white noise or generated tones or feedback. I do
have some storebought stuff but that's been splattered against the side of the
soundcard enough times that it bears *absolutely* no resemblance to the
original. Not that I would actually care about the logistics of using it... It
just doesn't interest me.
you that I'll release something that is almost
exclusively massive
guitar, since I'm a guitarist first and foremost.
Gotta love guitar stuff.
--
Though your brother's bound and gagged and they've chained him to a chair.
Won't you please come to Chicago just to sing. In a land that's known as freedom
how can such a thing be fair. Won't you please come to Chicago for the help that
we can bring. {Graham Nash}