26 Aug
2009
26 Aug
'09
1:03 p.m.
Paul Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Grammostola
Rosea<rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Now it's more clear what you mean, thanks.
\r
Paul Davis wrote:
I said "they don't have to be free. they have to be in a format
understood by free software".
nothing that jan said contradicts this. what he said was, paraphrased:
more and more sample libraries are released in formats NOT understood
by free software.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Francisco
López<lopezfrancisco1985(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Jan the maker of the soundtracks doesn't agree with you:
I'm really no expert and never intended to
make THAT kind of work, but I
think we'll encounter some technical issues if we try to do that with free
audio software under linux.
For starters, it should require a lot of Library Stacking. Do we have a LOT
of different great quality orchestral free sample libraries?
The libraries don't have to be free. They have to be in a format
understood by free software. LinuxSampler understands several such
library formats, and is an extremely, extremely efficient sample
playback engine. It can do more than almost any commercial sample
playback software on the same hardware.