21 Sep
2013
21 Sep
'13
9:52 a.m.
On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 10:47 +0300, Dan Muresan wrote:
on :-)
You mean this:
As I said, when providing a **summary**, i.e. a text
that people can
read without interruption to make up their minds, please provide the
quotations **in-text**, with full context (and, yes, perhaps with
URLs). Do not provide in-text quotations selectively. You've included
selected quotations in-text to support your points, while only
alluding to other quotations without posting them.
No, obvious reference links do not help.
You're already making a case that few people will support. You might
as least quote fairly instead of selectively, even if you put your
spin on the whole exchange.
On 9/21/13, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 10:26 +0300, Dan Muresan wrote:
>> If you provide a summary (even with your spin on it) please provide
>> full quotes for everything you refer to. In particular provide the
>> context for the "simple-minded" quote. Don't provide context only
>> selectively.
>
> My apologies, good that I still did read the mails regarding to this
> thread. I don't like to continue the discussion, but I will correct my
> mistake.
>
> The full quote is here:
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/2013-September/034216…
^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^ This is the text:
[LAD] forking (was Re: Aeolus)
Fons Adriaensen fons at linuxaudio.org
Fri Sep 20 20:24:12 UTC 2013
Previous message: [LAD] forking (was Re: Aeolus)
Next message: [LAD] forking (was Re: Aeolus)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author
]
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:04:57PM +0200, Felix Homann wrote:
Am 20.09.2013 21:56 schrieb "Fons
Adriaensen" <fons at
linuxaudio.org>:
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:52:06PM +0200, Felix Homann
wrote:
>
> > Would you mind Maurizio Gavioli to play around with your
code in
private?
>
> No.
>
> > don't think so. So why do you mind him sharing his
'playground'?
Why do you think I should feel the same about both ?
Because of the things I have written and you didn't comment You might argue that he better not published his
toying
around. But then
again you possibly forced him to do so: Just imagine
he gave a
binary to
someone. Then by the license *you* have chosen for
your code
*he* is
*obliged* to share his code - no matter how good or
worth
publishing it is.
I did not force him to anything. Giving a binary to anyone is
*his*
decision, not mine. And all that the original license obliges
him to
do in that case is to give the sources the same person.
A 'fork' on github is a convenient way to
comply with GPL
licenses.
'Convenient' is the key word here. Some people only think
of what's 'convenient' to them, everything else is too much
for their simple minds.
Ciao,
--
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
The context still is the context, is the context, is the context and I
guess that people followed the thread. Sorry again!
All shorten quotes IMO were not shamming another content, but I might be
wrong. All quotes in full length can be found in those archives:
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/
and on github
https://github.com/mgavioli/oscAeolus/issues/1
Regards,
Ralf