20 Feb
2013
20 Feb
'13
3:36 p.m.
2013/2/20 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>et>:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:13:11 +0100, Raffaele Morelli
<raffaele.morelli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
We always read you neverending replies so I guess you can survive to
this quite easily :-)
Yes I seriously belive that Awesome is really usable in a studio.
-r
--
L'unica speranza di catarsi, ammesso che ne esista una, resta affidata
all'istinto di ribellione, alla rivolta non isterilita in progetti,
alla protesta violenta e viscerale. (V. Evangelisti)
2013/2/20 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>et>:
I don't want to discuss this nonsense, but I also have written, that for a
minority such WMs might be ok, so don't skew my words. You can't seriously
belief, that such WMs will be good for _common_ workflow in _averaged_ audio
studios.
Perhaps there are, maybe there aren't, but tiled WMs anyway are useless
for
a serious audio production GUI workflow, you even don't need a WM, simply
use X only, if you like to break a sane workflow.
that's your questionable opinion with some garbage
first of all tiled WMs (like awesome) can be used in serious audio
production as you can/cannot use tiling
the sane workflow is the one which fits to the user