Hi,
I've been using the excellent Jkmeter for a few weeks. Recently I gt
hold of a SPL meter so using Jnoise I was able to calibrate the
speakers volume to the suggested 83db(C). Similar to what Steven
mentioned in his email, to me that sound level felt very uncomfortable
(way too high) so following my perception (and without using Jkmeter)
I started mixing everything way too low (I confirmed this after
playing one of my pieces at a electroacoustic music concert setup). So
I'm also wondering, did I misunderstood something or I'm just too
sensitive? Is my SPL meter not working (it's a new and made by a
Galaxy Audio)? Does the existent room noise (computer fans, street
noise leaking through the window, measuring around 50dBC)
significantly affects the measurement? I'll appreciate any comments on
this.
Thanks,
Hector
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Steven Chamberlain <steven(a)pyro.eu.org> wrote:
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Jkmeter is a horizontal or vertical bargraph
level
meter based on the ideas of mastering guru Bob Katz.
See <http://www.digido.com/bob-katz/index.php> and
follow the links on 'level practices'.
Hi,
I was a little sceptical at first, but having read the article I think
it's a great idea. My main concern was the magic number '83 dB(C)',
which has somewhat vague, historic origin, but also I thought I would go
deaf at that reference level.
With two speakers, I guess that would be 86 dB(C). Quite interestingly,
extrapolating the OSHA noise exposure limits down to that level, a
person could endure that for up to 16 hours a day without hearing loss.
That would make it, effectively, the loudest safe level for someone
who mixes music all day, and so making the fullest use of the ear's
comfortable dynamic range.
(OSHA limits are detailed on
http://www.elvex.com/facts07.htm )
As an experiment, I tried calibrating both of my monitor speakers with
-20 dBFS pink noise to 83 dB(C). Sound at that volume doesn't feel
comfortable to me. Perhaps I misunderstood something? Maybe I'm just
over-sensitive to that volume, perhaps because I have neighbours here,
don't have a house to myself, etc.
Under the K-20 system, it seems the maximum SPL when monitoring with two
speakers would be a scary 106 dB(C). Those monitoring levels would
force engineers to keep loudness down, or risk going deaf otherwise.
Presumably that would serve the intended purpose of the system, of
avoiding excessive loudness of recordings, but I think it carries some risk.
I think the K-14 system might be more to my own taste. I believe it
keeps the 83 dB(C) reference level, but with peaks up to 100 dB(C) in a
two-speaker setup. Sustained exposure for 2 hours even at the maximum
level should still be safe as per the OSHA limits, but of course that
level should rarely be reached anyway.
I'd very much like to hear how a K-20, K-14, or K-12 recording compares
to mainstream pop/rock/metal recordings. Perhaps the high reference
level would feel more comfortable with program material that isn't so
heavily compressed.
I'm also curious to know what sort of monitoring levels other people
have been using. I'd estimate that in the past I've been down to
something like 60 dB as a reference level, and resorting to headphones
when I felt more scrutiny was needed. This unfortunately seems
necessary here because I have other people living around me.
I'm looking forward to trying out the jkmeter implementation. And I
imagine a K-14 and even K-12 version would be very useful someday.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
steven(a)pyro.eu.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user