2 Jul
2012
2 Jul
'12
6:06 p.m.
FWIW, I'm currently using a RME Raydat w/ word clock module. I have two
pres going into a RME ADI-8 QS Converter, and 8 pres going through a
Focusrite converter. Not sure I'm doing it right, but I simply put the
wordclock connectors from raydat out to QS in, and raydat out2 to focusrite
in. Seems to be syncing (and locking) just fine. No problems with jack,
either.
Not sure what I'd do if I needed to connect a 3rd converter, as there are
only two wordclock connections on the raydat.
--Jason
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com>wrote;wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>wrote;wrote:
they don't even need to be equal. anything that can share a sample clock
can be made to run in perfect sync. ADAT clock has some issues, in my
experience. S/PDIF clock is better. Word clock is best.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf at
alice-dsl.net>wrote:
Apologize to the OP. So using ADAT + a wc sync, as the OP does, is a
benefit?!
If so, I should get a RME Word Clock Module (WCM). That won't make the
ADA 8000 a better device, but at least phases between the RME and the
Behringer (or some better ADAT devices) would be clean.
Just for the record. SPDIF and ADAT can sync two or more e q u a l
sound devices?
IIUC there never ever will be perfect sync
between cards using
different AD/DA converters.
not correct. sync just requires a shared sample clock. any two devices
with word clock connectors and a cable between them can do this.