18 Sep
2008
18 Sep
'08
3:09 p.m.
On Thursday 18 September 2008 12:47 pm, drew Roberts wrote:
Yup, up front. I have always felt that was a bit
onerous and perhaps
extremely
hard to enforce,
For sure! I never looked at it that way--I don't know what they'd be
able to do if I started out (in good faith) planning to write something
to be GPL'd, but later had the opportunity to dual license and sell it.
I guess it would be appropriate to then pay for Qt, but whether they
could require anything more than that would be "interesting".
but that is what they require.
Randy Kramer
--
I didn't have time to write a short letter, so I created a video
instead.--with apologies to Cicero, et.al.