14 Dec
2009
14 Dec
'09
5:10 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Gwenhwyfaer schrieb:
On 14/12/2009, Hartmut Noack
<zettberlin(a)linuxuse.de> wrote:
AMEN to that.
body bgcolor="#000080"
this is not a big issue, simply replace bgcolor="#000080" with
style="background-color:#000080;"
this looks exactly the same and helps to make a more modern site.
It doesn't look exactly the same on links, or dillo, or any browser
which doesn't support CSS.
A general plea to web designers everywhere: Either do ALL of your
layout (inc. colours) in CSS, and use HTML tags ONLY according to
their semantic meaning - or commit to doing as much layout in HTML as
you can, and only adding trimmings in CSS. Because if your webpage is
unreadable without CSS, it's unreadable.
Any website should be perfectly usable with CSS switched to OFF or in
any browser that ignores CSS. And BTW: any website should be perfectly
usable and look good with JavaScript OFF as well.
But HTML should only be used for semantics and DOM. I do not see any
reason for coding a chimera made out of abuse of tables for
layout-purposes, font-tags and bgcolor-attributes that break a new and
well-designed technology in favour of looking quite the same somewhat on
any given browser of the last 10 years.
Whenever I use Links and the like I search for fast and well-structured
information in an okayish generic design - not for individual designed
webpages....
best regs
HZN
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAksmqcAACgkQ1Aecwva1SWO0VACfR66prwLeDTkbpjNnlqQASO7B
fuYAnR3kvNPu74vOB7vYtlT8ApyVjg4L
=0ENV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----