Commercial VS NonCommercial Creative Commons [WAS: Re: [linux-audio-user] more odd music]

Hello En/na Ryan Gallagher ha escrit: I don't know wheter it is OT or not... I have one dilema. What do you think it is better NonCommercial or Commercial Creative Commons License? I think that NonCommercial has no sense for comunity made songs. If you use it to make something complex (that's the point of working with the community), then if you want to ever sell your records, it seems to me that you will never find the way to pay (or at least contact to ask permission to) all the contributors... On the other hand, if I release something as allowing Commercial uses I hate the possibility of knowing that maybe one day (let's say something stupid) M$ will use my song without paying anything to me or asking me permission, to market one of their become-a-slave-products. Maybe we could think of something new as "CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 (contact the authors for commercial purposes but if you are a music artist contributing to this song, feel free to use it commercially if you add something new to it and you sell it to people who will only listen it (not businesses using the song for other purposes)" what do you think of it? I raise this issue because I'm starting a musical project and I would like to never release any work that could end like http://www.lokitorrent.com/ when the people shares it, I would like to use other musicians works (and I can't afford to pay them for such work now) and I would finally like to win fairly some money making good music (without this money I will never be able to buy decent instruments) is it an utopia?