I wondered if I such a  DI box would make sense in my recording setup :
bass ---> mixing console ---> soundcard
How useful would it be to insert a DI  ?
bass ---> DI --> mixing console ---> soundcard
A guitarist friend of mine has tried to convince me so, but I did not
exactly grasp the whole argument ... I would have thought that the
console already serves as a preamp, but I may miss some point ?
Thanks for advice.
On 8/10/06, Paul Coccoli <pcoccoli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
  On 8/9/06, Paul Winkler <pw_lists(a)slinkp.com>
wrote:
  On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:37:16PM -0400, Paul
Coccoli wrote:
  If I had the money, I'd get a SansAmp Bass
Driver DI.  People on
 
talkbass.com rave about it.  You need a mic pre (with headphone jack
 in you case) though, as it has an XLR mic output. 
 OTOH, having been a bassist for about 25 years now,
 I can't stand the SansAmp BDDI. It's not a very "neutral" device -
 it has a strong personality, it scoops out vast amounts of
 midrange no matter what you do with the tone controls.
 For my taste, that is totally wrong.
 
 Hmm, I hadn't heard that.  I've never actually played one.
  Lots of people like it... poor lost souls :)
 For going DI, I prefer a decent passive DI followed by
 tweaking with plugins if necessary. SC4 is very handy; so is the 10-band EQ
 (I forget which suite that comes from). I also sometimes use
 the "tube warmth" or whatever it's called.
 
 I use the DIs in my cheapo M-Audio Audio Buddy.  They sound ok to me,
 and I like cheap stuff.  The CAPS tube amp sims sound ok on bass, but
 probably need low-pass filters (or EQ) after them.
  I really prefer micing the amp, but I recognize
that's not
 always doable.
 --
 Paul Winkler
 
http://www.slinkp.com