On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Laura Conrad wrote:
>>>> "Jamie" == Jamie Guinan <guinan(a)bluebutton.com> writes:
Jamie> I wouldn't call it a mistake just yet. I'm also running
Jamie> kernel 2.6.9 with no problems (Red Hat before, gentoo now),
Jamie> but with the EMS USB + PS2 pads. The kernel seems to at
Jamie> least see your device, and it shows a sane number of
Jamie> buttons, so that's a start.
Jamie> What does "ls -l /dev/js0" show?
[test]# ls -l /dev/input/js0
crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 13, 0 Jun 14 2001 /dev/input/js0
[test]#
[test]# ls -l /dev/js0
cr--r--r-- 1 root root 13, 0 Jan 14 2002 /dev/js0
[test]#
Jamie> I'm using udev, and my device shows up like this,
Jamie> $ ls -l /dev/input/js0
Jamie> crw-r--r-- 1 root root 13, 0 Sep 24 22:22 /dev/input/js0
I was wondering whether the relationship between /dev/js0 and
/dev/input/js0 was correct. I think I've fiddled with those
permissions, but both devices were there when I started.
Looks like the right major/minor numbers, which is what I was concerned
about.
Actually, I have to apologize - I'm actually running 2.6.8.1 on the
machine where my dance pads are attached. I can try 2.6.9...
-Jamie