On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 20:17 +0100, Carlo Capocasa wrote:
Oh so the bit depth has more influence on dynamic
range while the
sampling frequency has more influence on... errr, resolution? What would
that be, psychoacoustically... 'Finesse'?
Reduce the bit depth and the sound becomes more brittle, jagged, while
at the same time losing fine details.
I did some fascinating experiments with A/D - D/A convertor pairs
(hardware) that I designed and built in college. Digitizing sound on
2...4...6 bits can produce some funny sound effects. I wonder if there's
an easy way in software to shave off the lesser bits while preserving
the amplitude (I can think of a hard way, but I'm lazy).
The sampling frequency has influence mostly over the high frequencies.
What's gained at higher sampling frequencies is something I would call
"transparency".
But everyone's different and can perceive these things differently.
I guess you could do some experiments yourself. If you have a pair of
good phones, it's time to use them. ;-)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/