29 Jan
2011
29 Jan
'11
3:32 p.m.
On 01/29/2011 03:29 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
On 01/29/2011 03:03 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
nope, I was just going to point out the same.
what's different is the zombification behaviour. try using jack1 with "-Z"
The mp support of Jack2 seems to be an advantage
when it comes to cpu
load.
I just learned via #jack that smp support only applies when you use JACK
with parallel clients. Bit cryptic but better described here:
http://www.grame.fr/~letz/jackdmp.html
"Jackdmp current implementation allows explicit parallel clients in a
graph to be processed on several available CPU at the same time. A
typical case is:
* in == > A ==> C ==> out and in == > B ==> C ==> out
A and B depend of the same input (the "in" driver in this case) and can
be activated on 2 processors, C waits for A and B outputs. "
So afaik if you use Jack2 with a single client like Yoshimi it doesn't
take advantage of its smp support, hence it shouldn't make a difference
whether you use Jack1, Jack2 or tschack.
Hopefully I didn't get this wrong ;) Btw, I'm working on a tschack package for Ubuntu
10.04, almost done :)
Best,
Jeremy
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user