11 May
2010
11 May
'10
9:08 a.m.
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 10:00 -1000, david wrote:
I use jackdmp. Seeing no need whatsoever for Pulse, I have no desire to
re-install it just to see if it behaves itself now.
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
For reference (not specifically directed to you), more recent versions
of Pulse (not sure exactly which) and jack2 (jackdmp) cooperate in that
form. Recent distributions should have it sorted, unless they're using
jack1. On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:41 PM, david
<gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
Maybe in some version of PulseAudio you have. The one I
used to have
here did not. So I removed it. Simpler that way. I guess I still
consider PulseAudio unnecessary for any purpose.
rosea.grammostola wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:34 -1000, david wrote:
>> Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Hartmut Noack
<zettberlin(a)linuxuse.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>> This musing about "broken" alsa-drivers that need to be
"fixed" in the
>>>> thread at PA increases the bad feeling about PA's relation and
awarenes
>>>> to pro-audio.
>>>>
>>>> best regs
>>>> HZN
>>> PA is specifically for 'desktop' usage, pro-audio isn't a part
of
>>> that. If you're doing pro-audio you'd be running JACK anyway. I
>>> struggle to understand why a user would want PA, with all the inherent
>>> latency concerns (compared to JACK) to control their pro-audio
>>> soundcard.
>> Perhaps Pulse really just wants to get rid of JACK in the first place?
> ???
Replace JACK entirely with Pulse, become the only audio server game in town?
;-)
Yeah, world domination is ALWAYS on the agenda I'm sure. Which is why
Pulseaudio automatically suspends its control of a sound card with
jack2 requests control =)