20 Apr
2008
20 Apr
'08
4:56 p.m.
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 06:37:21PM -0400, nescivi
wrote:
No don't ! The procrastination processor is probably stack based.
eheh, yeah, kind of a lock-free implementation where the pop() operation
has the noop() semantics :))
--
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rncbc(a)rncbc.org
ah, is it
simply because there is this one developer here who suffers from
some form of chronic procrastination ? :)
so we need to find another feature request or bug so you can fix this one,
while procrastinating the other? ;)