20 Dec
2012
20 Dec
'12
9:32 p.m.
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 23:02 +0200, Moshe Werner wrote:
I see.
I thought that Ravenna interfaces (e.g. the Horus from Mergings)would
be able to interact with a computer without any other audio
interface,
and so if it would be open there would be no problem standing in the
way for Linux compatible drivers.
Too bad really as I was getting excited that in the near future there
would be no hardware limits for Linux users.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)rocketmail.com>
To: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
Subject: Re: [LAU] Ravenna
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:56:57 +0100
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 21:50 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Non sequitur. You have all interfaces running
stable on linux with
products from at least two different manufacturers. If you want to
get
your work done. nothing stands in your way.
I feel a bit different about this.
Yes I'm getting work done nicely, RME 9652 works like a charm.
But there is a certain bummer in not being able to choose from the
variety that's out there today. (Price, performance etc.)
Obviously my understanding of drivers is not so good, that's also the
reason I asked. On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 21:34 +0100, Florian Faber
wrote:
In radio forums it's written that Barix, Audio TX should be not good?
I don't have knowledge about those technologies, but it sounds very
interesting. Is there more information available for Linux?
You have all interfaces running stable on linux
with
products from at least two different manufacturers.
What vendors? Audiotx?