Am Montag, 14. Januar 2008 schrieb Fons Adriaensen:
Next question then was why all these HR recordings
sounded so
much better than the average CD recording of the same music -
most listeners and the also the authors of the report did agree
on that.
The answer suggested by the authors is quite sobering: because
these recordings have been made for a niche market of audiophiles,
and the sound engineers who made them were therefore not subject
to the usual pressure to produce a type of sound that record
companies think sells best (reduced dynamic range, a balance
that emphasizes solo parts, added reverb, EQ, etc.). In other
words because they were allowed to do the recording in the way
they believed was right, usually employing very simple recording
techniques.
If this is true, it means we are being deprived of good recorded
sound not because the technology isn't performing, but just
because bad sound sells better.
You get the same answer out of any serious discussion about compression and
mastering: Bad loud music sells better than for example an unplugged concert
recorded with just a stereo-mic (or some ambisonic-setup:)...
Arnold
--
visit
http://www.arnoldarts.de/
---
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your
administrator to do so...