Re: [LAU] inverting phase of one channel - bad idea?

Fons Adriaensen wrote: Ok, then we agree :-) However now I reread the post more closely, and it seems his intentions were a bit different. Here's what he wrote: "feed the left channel back to the right with a short delay, inverted; feed the right channel back to the left with a short delay, inverted;" Actually it sounds to me like the inverting part becomes irrellevant. When the delayed + inverted sound is output, the original audio has moved on and the delayed audio is simply "something new" that's mixed in, inverted or not. Is this some kind of well known trick or am I right that inverting the delayed signal doesn't do anything (good) for the result? -- peace, love & harmony Atte http://atte.dk | http://myspace.com/attejensen http://anagrammer.dk | http://modlys.dk