--- Patrick Shirkey <pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com>
wrote:
R Parker wrote:
How do think the owners of GPL licensed software
will
feel when this behaviour you subscribe to becomes
the
norm for their source code? What distinguishes a
DJ
from the person who violates those rights?
GPL anything can be freely remixed. What's your
point?
The GPL defines a set of rights. What happens when I
violate those rights? You claim it's OK to violate the
rights of the copyright owner for music. What is the
difference? Why is it OK to violate a musicians rights
but not OK to violate a software developers rights?
Ron Parker
Mirror Image Studio
> the
liklihood of that happening around here is
slim
to non
existant.
So, If you are going to complain every time a DJ
makes a remix
Please don't use a personal attacks when debating
with
me.
HuH?
There is a system in place that enables you to
use
property that other people own the rights to. Be
responsible and learn to use it.
There's plenty I'd like to say but ironically
enough I
have a session with a DJ for whom we wrote the
beats.
It'll go about six or eight hours. Maybe
I'll
check in
later to see what's up. Maybe I won't.
Up to you.
--
Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd.
Http://www.boosthardware.com
Http://lau.linuxaudio.org - The Linux Audio Users
guide
========================================
"Anything your mind can see you can manifest
physically, then it will
become reality" - Macka B
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com