30 Jun
2010
30 Jun
'10
4:48 p.m.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, drew Roberts wrote:
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 09:29:21 Gabriel M.
Beddingfield wrote:
The point is: people seem to be really cavalier about who
has rights to the art that they did not create.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Dave Phillips wrote:
Isn't this a false dichotomy though? Why must a musician try and make a living
from royalties? Are there no other options? I have an observation re: this thread: People who
don't hold copyrights
or patents typically don't understand the full significance of copyright
or patent laws because they never have to. Those of us who do hold them
regard the issue differently. My advice, try making your living from
royalties for a
Well said!
-gabriel And even if there are no other options, is it worth
the
harm done to the rest of the world?
Harm? Are you really /harmed/ because the artist asked
you to /pay/ for a copy of his recording??
gimme a break.
-gabriel