31 Mar
2017
31 Mar
'17
4:56 p.m.
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:32:18 +0200, Peter wrote:
wouldn't that be on >80ms latency. If that's
the order where
'disturbing' starts then I find that number interesting, as (if I
remember correctly) that's the fastest scale a human can react.
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ bpm2ms 90 | grep 1/32
(60000ms/90BPM)*4*(1/32)= ~83.33333333333333333333ms
So this would be 1/32 note at 90 BPM. This is something a musician
should notice, let alone that artists are not seldom "freaks", e.g.
savants, autists etc., some even without being aware to "suffer" from
autism or something similar.
But brain might be cheating in assuming having played
We are at least aware of what was played already before, what already
is "processed" by the brain. So I wouldn't it call it "cheating",
but
what we are doing is based on "extrapolation". You were to late, the
brain takes a while to notice this and then you compensate it. A good
musician isn't to late, a beginner often is out of time.