Re: [LAU] Kxstudio RT kernel vs low latency

On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 10:33:07 +0200 Jeremy Jongepier <jeremy(a)autostatic.com> wrote: Not at all, go ahead. There are a few things I wish I would have written differently, but it was a ml post and not an essay :) The rt testing package is indeed called rt-tests and not rt-tools. The reason I see max scheduling latencies of about 100us on the -rt kernel with cyclictest is most likely due to using the -i100 parameter. Setting it lower would likely result in lower max values, but at the cost of increasing cpu use. In fact I think the max scheduling latencies on my system is more likely around 40us or so, but what really interests me is to know that I don't have max values into the millisecond range. -- Joakim