8 Mar
2003
8 Mar
'03
7:22 p.m.
Jaakko,
It creates fftw.h and rfftw.h, no prefix. Of course, the big question
is why did it work in 0.3.6 and not in 0.3.7.
Jan
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 14:45, Jaakko Prättälä wrote:
On Saturday 08 March 2003 21:29, Jan \"Evil
Twin\" Depner wrote:
checking for fftw_one in -lsfftw... no
checking for fftw_one in -lfftw... no
configure: error: Could not find working fftw library. Package now
requires it
I have installed fftw-2.1.3. I have tried it installed in /usr and
/usr/local with the same results. Running gcc 2.96 on RH 7.3.
I've sometimes had some problems with the two header
naming conventions in fftw. There's an option for fftw's
configure-script to specify whether you want the header files
with or without type prefix. IIRC Red Hat 7.3 comes _with_
type prefix, so it might be that you have files drfftw.h and dfftw.h
for double-precision and/or srfftw.h & sfftw.h (was it?) for single precision.
FFTW's configure-script defaults to no prefix.
Maybe the swh-plugins configure-script is looking for files without
the 'd' or the 's': rfftw.h and fftw.h. When I was using 7.3 I just made
symlinks.
--
Jaakko Prättälä
Jaakko.Prattala(a)Helsinki.FI