4 Jun
2016
4 Jun
'16
8:49 p.m.
On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 16:22:38 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Robert Edge
<thumbknucklerocks(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Than this Google thingy is a tool, used for an opus, but not a machine
that does compose. This are two completely different approaches.
I would argue that this is "process
music", and that the actual
composers are the people that programmed the AI.
That was precisely my point, mostly. I also find it deeply beautiful. But Reich didn't
compose it to convey
a state of mind (or heart).
But he did, because he is a being with emotions. He wanted to do it,
because he has a live, experiences, passion and an impetus. A machine
has nothing of those qualities. If you program a machine as a tool,
used by you, it's not the same as programming a machine to do something
on it's own.