30 Mar
2007
30 Mar
'07
7:43 a.m.
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 11:27 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Bengt Gördén hat gesagt: // Bengt Gördén wrote:
Same here. List-Id headers allow you to "Reply to list" in clients that
support it - no need to "Reply to all", creating confusing extra To:
addresses, or type in the address manually and lose the In-Reply-To
headers, thus ruining the thread structure.
--ll
fredag 30 mars 2007 00:38 skrev Robin Gareus:
I would love if the current List-id's could be kept, except the
list-addresses. X-BeenThere:
linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
X-BeenThere: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
X-BeenThere: linux-audio-announce(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
Sure. It will probably take care of the problem but the X-headers are not
standard (although they are used quite frequently). The List-ID is.
I'm not sure how it would look but something like this I expect. Mind you. Not
an @ but rather a dot(.) in between.
List-id: lad.lists.linuxaudio.org
List-id: lau.lists.linuxaudio.org
List-id: laa.lists.linuxaudio.org