17 Feb
2004
17 Feb
'04
10:19 p.m.
--- Steve Harris <S.W.Harris(a)ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
Hmm... I've no idea what that would do - youd
have
to ask whover
implemented freewheel. I think you have to feed the
output of JAMin back
into ardour (or some other non-RT capable recorder)
for it to work.
In fact I was doing Ardour -> JAMin -> Ardour. My bad.
I have to admit I've never tried it, I'm not
even
sure how you engage
freewheel :)
I was doing an Export Audio. I assume that's
freewheel.
At any rate, the result of 'Export Audio' with a
Ardour -> JAMin -> Ardour chain is not the output of
JAMin. Because it's been a few days since I tried this
I will reconfirm in the morning and report the results
to ardour-dev or Mantis.
ron
- Steve
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:40:52AM -0800, R Parker
wrote:
online.
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
have you tried freewheel with ardour and jamin in
the
chain? you can see it's trying to work by the
jamin
meters but the result is not mastered. my
attempt
produced the unmastered source.
stereo file in ardour to jamin input, jamin out to
hardware
--- Steve Harris <S.W.Harris(a)ecs.soton.ac.uk>
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 02:34:29 -0500,
Chris
> Pickett wrote:
> > If things have changed in the last 6-8 months
I'm
> interested to hear.
> > I would be intrigued if, for example, JACK
could
> now synchronize
> > applications and plugins to a slower- or
> faster-than-realtime clock,
> > depending on the processing power needed, or
even
if there
were still
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing future plans for this.
Yes, thats JACKs Freewheel mode.
- Steve