21 Feb
2004
21 Feb
'04
11:13 p.m.
Actually it's acting as the front-end to the 1023 band EQ. The curve is
splined to 1023 separate frequency bands. The same thing happens with
the 31 band EQ it's just that you don't have the same amount of control.
With the HDEQ you can cut or boost *very* narrow bands. I have a
recording of a band I was sitting in with in Ft Lauderdale a few years
back. When we recorded there was a very narrow band of feedback that
would show up occasionally. I used the HDEQ to cut just that
frequency. I couldn't have done that with the 31 band EQ and, since it
was just a live stereo recording there was no mixing going on. One of
the nice things about using Ardour/JACK/JAMin is that you can hook up
Ardour->JAMin->Ardour and run tests while tweaking both the mixing and
mastering.
Jan
On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 20:25, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 18:17, Jan Depner wrote:
Have you used the HDEQ yet? I actually use the
background spectrum to
figure out where to do very small boosts and cuts. Also, by the time
you're mastering you shouldn't really be doing anything else that
requires a lot of CPU power. I normally run Ardour->JAMin->Ardour when
I master and I get about 45% CPU usage on my Athlon 1700+.
Jan
Yes, I have used it, and it's very nice. It feels *good*, you know, when
I'm listening and changing things a bit.
I guess my thought was that, assuming I understand the architecture of
the program, it's acting as a visual front end to the 32 channel EQ. If
there were simply fewer channels in the EQ then wouldn't thee be lower
CPU usage?
- Mark
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Jamin-devel mailing list
Jamin-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jamin-devel