12 Dec
2007
12 Dec
'07
2:45 p.m.
On Mi, 12.12.07 16:11 "Rui Nuno Capela" <rncbc(a)rncbc.org> wrote:
On Wed, December 12, 2007 15:51, Chris Cannam wrote:
That's exactly why I asked for a new tarball.. I want to update the
Gentoo ebuild in our pro-audio overlay, and portage doesn't simply use
tar xvf, but bunzip2 && tar x
For sure affects other source based meta-distros too.
Thanks for the new tarball!
Regards,
Tom
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 15:10, gimpel
wrote:
have you considered automated packaging into your equation? gentoo
comes to mind, but i'm not a gentooer :)
cheers Could you please rename the tarball on
sourceforge to .gz or
upload a real .bz2?
Several people have asked me this. Apologies for the mistake; I've
uploaded a real .bz2 now, to replace the bz2 with a gz extension I
originally uploaded.
While I'm grateful to have the error caught, I'm intrigued as to
why so many people thought this was important enough to write an
email about -- why would anyone really care? Surely anyone
prepared to build this from source is capable of unpacking an
archive that happens to have the wrong extension? Am I missing
something?