Re: [LAU] Bye Bye 32 bit

On 12/26/2017 09:34 PM, Will Godfrey wrote: so the rpi is finally going down the drain? (or not so, just because Debian is conservative enough to not drop 32bit archs?) i'm having a hard time imagining an audio software system that cannot run on multi-core systems with N==1. (unless you setup artificial guards that will simply refuse to run if they detect less than N>1 CPUs) as others pointed out: 32bit vs 64bit is (from a distro perspective) are (completely) different architectures. otoh, 1 core vs 2 cores vs 4 cores vs 4069 cores is mainly an hardware extension (that is: the user can - in theory - just add more CPUs to their existing hardware). to contracdict myself: one can easily think of audio software that (strictly) depends on CUDA (or other hardware acceleration), so they would require multiple PUs (that's even worse than requiring multiple cores). or audio software that requires super computing powers with many-core systems to do anything in a reasonable time (deep learning foo). but i tihnk both these examples will stay niche products (even nichier than your average linux software) in the foreseeable future, so shouldn't concern you much :-) otoh, i think one important development in the last years has been virtualisation. now running a couple of VMs on your 16 core laptop will quickly eat away your CPU powers - and more so, if you allocate 8 cores to each VM. so my personal VMs only get a single core allocated by default. while running audio software in a VM might seem a but odd, i think that any software not allowing such a use-case should die right away (probably excepting virtualisation software), gadsmr IOhannes