23 Feb
2007
23 Feb
'07
4:43 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Gaydenko schrieb:
======= On Friday 23 February 2007, Hartmut Noack wrote: =======
Terratec EWX 24/96 / envy24
Since the first time, I compared the output of
ams at 16/44.1 to the
output of the very same patch at 24/96 I know, what hi-res is good for ;-)
Which DAC have you used? The thing is, real resolution of almost all
DACs is not better rather 14-15 bits. Very rare and very expensive DACs
have real resolution about 20-21 bits.
May it be :-) the switch from 16/44.1 to 24/96 is very well audible
anyway :-). I guess, for the realworld-usage of this card signal/noise
ratio is of greater importance then the question, if the DAC could
compute even greater resolution then the one I hear.
So having the very same DAC in a breakoutbox shielded from Fanmotors and
Powersupplies could increase the quality of the recordings...
best regards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF3qjc1Aecwva1SWMRAubIAJ903kgKzZu3gJAT1m10jyuRE+O3mwCdG/RF
1BC0o5UPFD0jt4c19UERBGc=
=XEmn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----