16 Jun
2009
16 Jun
'09
10:22 a.m.
A nice way to start audio app programing is FAUST, you can write you
algorithm in "plain math" and let it translate from the FAUST compiler
to C++.
Faust build the dsp code and, if you wont a GUI Interface. The resulting
Source Code show some nice habits for how you can design your app to get
a clean distance between the GUI part and the dsp part. The FAUST
compiler optimize your "math dsp" to run real fast and stable.
You can rework the C++ source afterwards with the IDE of your choice.
Also FAUST comes with some faust libs with contain some nice filters
osci and math funktions and a bunch of examples to start with.
Faust could also translate your code to a Pd patch. And mutch more.
http://faust.grame.fr/
Am Dienstag, den 16.06.2009, 03:47 -0700 schrieb Justin Smith:
As far as higher level apps are concerned, Ocaml has
libraries
available for jack, alsa, and ladspa. It is garbage collected but much
faster than most other garbage collected languages. I have not tried
these libs, but they may be worth checking out. When I code an audio
app, I usually start with a prototype in PD (galan, ingen, or maybe
even ams would probably work too, but PD is more like a programming
language), then I translate the logic of the PD patch into C. If you
know your patch well enough, the translation is trivial. Since I am OK
with using PD's license, I can even peek at the C source of PD if I am
having trouble translating some built in PD object for my algorithm
(for example their optimized 4 point interpolation algorithm is
something I would not have discovered on my own).
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Robert Jonsson<spamatica(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
To generalize (and I like to generalize)
all languages that do garbage collect, or otherwise cannot be trusted to
keep deadlines, are no good for producing audio.
This goes for most modern languages, Java, C#, basically all scripting
languages.
As I said, this is a generalization. In todays ever-faster computers the
border is moving... still the best language for the job would be C/C++.
Some good IDEs for for "visual" development are, kdevelop, eclipse and a new
contender QT Creator, which to me looks to be a extremely competent solution
(especially for a first release).
Others will probably disagree.
/Robert
2009/6/15 Crypto <crptdngl71(a)gmx.net>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Hi,
I am considering to dig a bit deeper into audio application programming
and
now I wonder which IDE and programming language to use. Are Mono,
Monodevelop
and C# too bloated for that or are they it just as fine as any other
IDE/programming language like C/C++ would be?
Thx for any recommendations here.
Regards,
Crypto.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user