18 Nov
2006
18 Nov
'06
9:43 p.m.
On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 20:38 -0500, Joseph M. Gaffney wrote:
On Saturday 18 November 2006 20:29, Thomas Vecchione
wrote:
Why not make it free in all meanings of the word?
--
Lars Luthman - please encrypt any email sent to me if possible
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x04C77E2E
Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A E1B3 4371 4650 04C7 7E2E
I'm curious, I couldn't find information
on licensing on the page,
repeatedly they say free, but I am curious whether they mean free as in
open-source, or free as in beer.
Seablade
Good catch - this changes my opinion on things.
Member of programming team Ykkrosh:
"0 A.D. is (according to the current plans) going to be 'free' as in no
cost,
but not all 'Free' as in freedom (or even as in open source) (though some
components are likely to be) - so it can't be called 'free software', and
would probably not be accepted by GNU people."