29 Apr
2016
29 Apr
'16
4:55 p.m.
Totally agree with Mark's arguments on maintenance. Having a simple UI and
complex UI is not such a good idea. It would be better to just not dump
complex stuff on the first panel. And this is what I meant about Musician
and Sound Designer use cases, I did not mean to have separate interfaces
like Zyn has now.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Len Ovens <len(a)ovenwerks.net> wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, david wrote:
Agreed, I'm generally a resident of the Knob Universe and now I have the
In my opinion... knobs and sliders should operate the same. The mouse
moves in a straight line either sideways or vertical. For the same size
screen area, a knob can probably _show_ a finer resolution that a slider,
maybe 3 to 1 -ish? In other words, the widget's most important goal is to
show the control's position. The mouse movement to change that control can
be independant of that. One of the early sequencers I used (on an Atrari)
just had the numeric value as a widget. Holding the mouse button down and
moving it up or down adjusted the value. (sideways may have worked too, but
it has been a while :) This did (on such a low resolution screen) allow a
very tight control packing.
My favourite knobs are operated with either/or right to left, down to up.
There is also no reason a horizontal slider needs to be locked to only
horizontal mouse movement or a vertical slider to only vertical movment.
(don't knock it till you've used it for a month)
--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
--
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.com/
data to
show that people who like to reply to the survey tend towards
that side as well.
For some reason, I find sliders easier to operate, physically and
onscreen, but I like knobs for some functions. I find onscreen knobs less
easy to operate. Guess I'm weird.