29 Jul
2005
29 Jul
'05
10:40 a.m.
I remember using precisely this method as a wind filter on a mic in an
old demo version of a previous band i was in... and, hell, it sure did
work, you could notice the changes of the voice right away
PD: keep it simple! (Keith Richards)
2005/7/29, bob <fsmith(a)walescomputers.co.uk>uk>:
**** i'd maybe get one of those pantyhose things
to put in front of the
mic *****
I'd make sure their news one!!!! :)
Very good advice though
bob
Shayne O'Connor wrote:
--
Daniel Payno _-_ a.k.a. _-_ Pay
http://dpayno.webhop.net http://pqs.is.dreaming.org
James Stone wrote:
cool - another
I am not completely happy with my singing on this
but didn't think it
was
worth being too perfect against the background of cheesy soundfonts.. I
may yet re-record it..
sounds fine to me. maybe bring outthe organ in the, um, breakdown (?)
*just a tad* ...
On the subject of Mics, does anyone think it is
worth spending
anything on
a low-end microphone considering I will be recording in a room with
echoing walls, and a not=so silent computer, into a cheap SBLive! card??
man, spend the money on booze instead, or whatever yr poison may be
... keep it simple like this and you can't go wrong ... i'd maybe get
one of those pantyhose things to put in front of the mic to get rid of
those plosives maybe, but man that sounds great to me. let the
producer worry about that stuff when you get signed up ;)
shayne