3 Aug
2004
3 Aug
'04
6:26 p.m.
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 03:50 pm, Alastair Couper wrote:
I am looking into getting a decent microphone, but am
having a hard time
wading through all the obviously subjective yet passionately held opinions
that I see in various reviews. I am skeptical that a $1000 mic is 5 times
better than a $200 mic. How much of what I read and hear is simply an arms
race for professional studios ? In talking to pro friends with their
As much as you're thinking. All the marketing is based in fact, but it's a lot
of hair splitting. Demo mics and trust your ears. Start the comparison with a
mic you're familiar with to calibrate your senses. Also consider how you're
going to use the mic, you may be better off with something that's a little
more robust vs one with "better" specs (read: more expensive).
multi-k$ mic/preamps, it seems to end with: "It
was either that, or give
the money to the gov in taxes."
OT:
This is a very important statement and bears thinking about when considering
cost as a factor for linux audio market penetration. I would bold tag this and
make it blink red if I sent HTML email.
Any links to info much appreciated.
I expect you're clued on the polar pattern and dynamic vs condenser issues.
I've heard the capsule size vs freq response chestnut has been invalidated,
but I'd still go with a large capsule.
"The low end has a lot of sizzle and the highs are very warm" (joke)