Am Montag, 14. April 2008 schrieb Paul Davis:
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 10:04 +0200, Arnold Krille
wrote:
So PulseAudio is by design not _the_ solution
for
sound on the desktop. It is just another middle-layer for sound.
reasonable people
might choose to disagree about this.
Does PA cover all the points today's desktop apps need? Does it have video?
And yes, video has proven to be one of the important requisites for
desktop-app-devs during the Phonon-design-process...
* intra-application management of media streams
* delivery/receipt of media streams to endpoints outside
of an application
PulseAudio is aimed at the second task; gstreamer is aimed at the first.
my impression is that Phonon is attempting to cover both. good? bad?
*you* decide :)
Hmm, using one lib/api against using two or more... I know, I go for using
_one_ api for it all. And if it is already inside the toolkit I use, the
decision gets even more easy.
And PulseAudio
claims to unify both desktop-needs and pro-audio-needs.
Another place it will fail big time. Because it will never be good enough
to have ardour use PulseAudio. (Hint: Jack was designed for ardour...)
Lennart
(PA's author) fully understands how and why JACK is different
from PulseAudio, and has long term to plans to try to provide
jack-server functionality within pulse. PA also has a JACK backend
already, so that you can use "desktop" apps while JACK is running and
still hear them.
That last argument probably applies to _every_ soundsystem out there on linux.
Because everytime one of them authors claims to revolutionize the sound on
linux the lad/lau guys ask "can you make use of jack?", they sit down and
produce a sink to use jack for output. But what is the purpose to stack PA on
top of esd (or gstreamer) on top of Jack on top of alsa???
Arnold
--
visit
http://www.arnoldarts.de/
---
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your
administrator to do so...