3 Jan
2003
3 Jan
'03
6:56 a.m.
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 09:57:52 +0000, Daniel James wrote:
Best to ask the people who contribute the loops. If they intend to
dual-licence their loops, making them available to OMRL without restrictions
on commercial reuse could undermine this.
Doesn't that kindof defeat the point of the open library?
I think the FSF has shown that people will go to the source to buy CDs or
whatever, evne if that is the most expensive place to buy them from.
I think the mailing list is a good idea BTW.
- Steve
3) Users will *not* be free to download any loops,
samples, and patches
(raw materials) to package up and sell on a for-profit basis.
Why not? I think, prohibiting selling is *bad*.