2 Dec
2004
2 Dec
'04
1:32 p.m.
Dave Phillips wrote:
Russell Hanaghan wrote:
Hmph! I don't have to come here for that kind of abuse Mister; I can go
anywhere to get that!! :)
The fact that you can get it to run as root but
not as mortal user
tells us something I guess. When I was going thru my VST nightmares,
I could not get it to run at all...and I was about to jump from the
proverbial cliff ! Then Dave Phillips took pity on my feeble,
whimpering self...a mere shell of a former true man of persistance... :)
Actually, it was just to get Russell to stop complaining... ;-)
(Sorry, Russell, I couldn't help myself!)... -Any vst-in-linux app is heavily reliant on the
version of Wine. But
we know for a fact that 20040505 is a working version. It works on my
MDK box, and Mark has it working, as do several others here.
I'm using 20031118, an antique version by now.
-Crystal is one of the definate .dll's that
does work of the vst's.
So does HyperCanvas 1.02. (Not sure if thats what you ultimatley want
running here?)
Crystal is indeed a very fine synth, I use it frequently. HyperCanvas
works here, but I have to be careful about a few things. I'm not sure
if it's beause my machine is too slow (an 800 MHz Duron), but the
synth will not respond to manual parameter changes while running
(they'll update though when I stop playing), and it's relatively easy
to crash (like if I pick up the window and move it around a lot).
Sometimes it just disappears from the JACXK graph, the MIDI connection
is still there, but the audio connection is completely gone.
The variable performance of VST/VSTi plugins under Linux leads me to
wonder if the Windows APIs aren't somehow very fault tolerant in ways
the WINE guys haven't figured yet.
Did you do a Winblows install of the vst
application? If so, did you
do it as root and not user? I know a full Win install is not needed
with for Crystal...but is for Hypercanvas I think.
I do not have a Windows installation on my machine, but I do
adviseinstalling VST plugins by using their installation wizards,
i.e., not merely dropping the DLL into a directory and calling it
done. Some plugins won't complain about that at all, others are
extremely picky about how they're installed.
What kernel are you using now?
I'm still on 2.4 here, it appears that 2.6 is "issue-filled"...
Best,
dp