10 May
2010
10 May
'10
10 p.m.
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:41 PM, david
<gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
Maybe in some version of PulseAudio you have. The one I used to have
here did not. So I removed it. Simpler that way. I guess I still
consider PulseAudio unnecessary for any purpose.
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
rosea.grammostola wrote:
Yeah, world domination is ALWAYS on the agenda I'm sure. Which is why
Pulseaudio automatically suspends its control of a sound card with
jack2 requests control =) On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:34 -1000, david wrote:
Replace JACK entirely with Pulse, become the only audio server game in town?
;-) Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin(a)linuxuse.de>
> wrote:
>> This musing about "broken" alsa-drivers that need to be
"fixed" in the
>> thread at PA increases the bad feeling about PA's relation and awarenes
>> to pro-audio.
>>
>> best regs
>> HZN
> PA is specifically for 'desktop' usage, pro-audio isn't a part of
> that. If you're doing pro-audio you'd be running JACK anyway. I
> struggle to understand why a user would want PA, with all the inherent
> latency concerns (compared to JACK) to control their pro-audio
> soundcard.
Perhaps Pulse really just wants to get rid of JACK in the first place?
???