Hiho,
the streamteam of the LAC is working long hours each year to make
everything happen - and the video/audio streams are of quite high
quality each year, and the questions from IRC do add to the conference.
Any help to improve the online-ness of the LAC in addition to the
offline-ness is appreciated.
Suggestions are welcome, especially if backed up by work on making
these things happen.
sincerely,
Marije
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 23:07:19 -0500
Thomas Vecchione <seablaede(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I should clarify that when I asked about online I was
meaning making
sure to have the ability to interact/converse/etc. Merely streaming
to the net doesn't provide this, and IRC only provides a very limited
version of this.
Although I can see the thought of wanting to meet in person and
absorb the atmosphere.
Seablade
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Folderol <folderol(a)ukfsn.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:10:58 -0500
> Thomas Vecchione <seablaede(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > So here is my kickback to this, as Nil's comments are the same
> > reason I don't go to many conferences, LAC included. Is there
> > any reason that LAC shouldn't possibly happen online? Here I am
> > not just talking about broadcast video necessarily, but thinking
> > about the actual conference and whether it might be able to be
> > put in effect online, which seems to fit with LAC especially.
> >
> > Just musing out loud right now mind you, haven't really thought it
> through
> > much.
> >
> > Seablade
>
> For me, it's very much about absorbing the atmosphere of the events
> and meeting
> the people behind the ideas. There are dimensions of communication
> that are simply not conveyed at all over any from of AV.
>
> --
> Will J Godfrey
>
http://www.musically.me.uk
> Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
> Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
>
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>