11 May
2009
11 May
'09
11:29 p.m.
Garry Ogle wrote:
Julien Claassen wrote:
His license includes a reason it's not open source:
You're right. But a couple of us have tried
and it didn't work. We might do a
kind of a petition and send him a kind plea with the petitioners names attached.
Might that help? I've heard it, it sounds great. Kindest regards Julien
Hi, Julien. Did you succeed in contacting this guy and he refused? Or couldn't you
make contact? When was that?
I love the sounds on his samples! You can have my name on that petition! 1. LICENSE - PLEASE READ
YOU MAY FREELY DOWNLOAD AND INSTALL A COPY OF THE SOFTWARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL USE.
YOU MAY NOT BUNDLE, RENAME, SELL, REDISTRIBUTE, REPACKAGE OR IN ANY OTHER WAY ALTER
WHOLE OR PART OF THE SOFTWARE AND ITS DISTRIBUTION WITHOUT PRIOR, EXPRESS AND
WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE AUTHOR.
The purpose of this rather restrictive license is simple: I do not want multiple
versions splitting off with my name in them when the program is still under
development. If you feel that you would like to make a serious contribution to the
project, please contact me.
Note the last sentence. It sounds like he'd be more open to community development
than forking his code.
-Scott