22 Jan
2011
22 Jan
'11
11:38 a.m.
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:37:04 +0000
Peter Nelson <peter(a)fuzzle.org> wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 18:25 -0800, Kim Cascone wrote:
... and the devs seem highly resistant to the idea of writing in full jack
support - they've certainly been asked often enough. Maybe it's due to
cross-platform implications.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
when I connect the output of Audacity to
Timemachine _by hand_ using
Patchage
there is a delay in the stereo sound file between the start of audio in
ch1 & 2
which is equal to the time at which the connections are physically made
to timemachine
in other words:
- I create a 10 sec file of 440Hz sine in Audacity
- play it back on loop
- go to Patchage and connect ch1 from PortAudio (which is actually
Audacity) to Timemachine wait 10 seconds then connect ch2 to the other
input of Timemachine
- hit record on Timemachine wait a couple of seconds
- stop record on Timemachine
- stop playback of 440 sine in Audacity
- open the sound file recorded by Timemachine in Audacity
- look at the start of the sound file
- there is a delay between channels seen in the sound file equal to the
time I waited to connect ch1 & ch2
Maybe you could try with a JACK-native audio player. See below...
side question: why do the outputs of Audacity
appear as PortAudio in Jack?
is it a reference to virtual ports being instantiated when playback
occurs in Audacity?
No, it's because Audacity does not support JACK. It only half-manages it
through using the PortAudio library.
Peter.