10 Aug
2011
10 Aug
'11
4:56 a.m.
On Wed Aug 10 12:31 , Oon-Ee Ng sent:
Ouch..
It does seem there is a way around the problem so if there isn't an available
diff, are there some manual instructions anywhere that allow them to cooperate?
On Aug 10, 2011 9:11 AM, "sonofzev(a)iinet.net.au" <sonofzev(a)iinet.net.au>
wrote:
rt-patch which
disallows their use by the nvidia binary. Patching that would
probably violate the GPL.
On Wed Aug 10 8:43 , Arve Barsnes sent:
>On 9 August 2011 21:54, Atte André Jensen
atte(a)email.dk> wrote:
>> On 08/09/2011 09:03 PM, david wrote:
> > >>> My brief experience with Kernel 3.0
came with the discovery that it
>>> doesn't support the NV video
driver,
> > >> That doesn't sound good...
> > >Is that with a rt kernel or vanilla?
Remember, you need to patch the
>nvidia drivers to function with the later rt
kernels.
> >Arve
I had this pain with the rt kernel.. (only).. can
someone point out a link to the
patch for the nvidia-drivers...
I asked
about that on the rt list, but some symbols are exported GPL by the 
10 Aug
10 Aug
5:13 a.m.
New subject: rt audio with kernel 3.0 - looking good
Am Mittwoch, den 10.08.2011, 02:56 +0000 schrieb sonofzev(a)iinet.net.au:
On Wed Aug 10 12:31 , Oon-Ee Ng sent:
Ouch..
It does seem there is a way around the problem so if there isn't an available
diff, are there some manual instructions anywhere that allow them to cooperate?
as far I know you need to convert 3 symbols to EXPORT_SYMBOL instead
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. That are
__rt_mutex_init
migrate_enable
migrate_disable
You could find them in the source by
grep 'EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(migrate_disable)' -R ./
./kernel/sched.c:EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(migrate_disable);
grep 'EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(migrate_enable)' -R ./
./kernel/sched.c:EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(migrate_enable);
grep 'EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rt_mutex_init)' -R ./
/kernel/rtmutex.c:EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rt_mutex_init)
With a proper sed you could replace it, or do it by hand.
But I'm no Nvidia user, cant promise that this is right.
That is just what I've heard.
Note, doing this as end user didn't violate the GPL.
greats
hermann
On Aug 10, 2011 9:11 AM, "sonofzev(a)iinet.net.au" <sonofzev(a)iinet.net.au>
wrote:
rt-patch which
disallows their use by the nvidia binary. Patching that would
probably violate the GPL.
On Wed Aug 10 8:43 , Arve Barsnes sent:
>On 9 August 2011 21:54, Atte André Jensen
atte(a)email.dk> wrote:
>> On 08/09/2011 09:03 PM, david wrote:
> > >>> My brief experience with Kernel 3.0
came with the discovery that it
>>> doesn't support the NV video
driver,
> > >> That doesn't sound good...
> > >Is that with a rt kernel or vanilla?
Remember, you need to patch the
>nvidia drivers to function with the later rt
kernels.
> >Arve
I had this pain with the rt kernel.. (only).. can
someone point out a link to the
patch for the nvidia-drivers...
I asked
about that on the rt list, but some symbols are exported GPL by the
4888
days inactive
4888
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
hermann -
sonofzev＠iinet.net.au