15 Mar
2010
15 Mar
'10
2:42 a.m.
For anyone, like me, who doesn't have a background in audio
engineering, this (I believe) Italian site seems pretty nice,
info-wise:
http://www.audiosonica.com/
TOC:
http://www.audiosonica.com/en/course/post/2/Index
From the site -
"The Multimedia Audio Course
is a Sound engineering course adopted by
audio schools.
The online version is completely free and under Creative Commons license."
I ran across it when googling for some info. Lots of material that
some people here might find useful. For money, there's also a
download-able premium version.
If the site has already been mentioned here, well, ok.
15 Mar
15 Mar
8:42 a.m.
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:42:50PM -0700, sevol wrote:
"The Multimedia Audio Course is a Sound
engineering course
adopted by audio schools. The online version is completely
free and under Creative Commons license."
I wouldn't recommend anyone paying for a 'school' using
that course. Or even not paying for it. Just 15 minutes
of cursory reading shows it is full of errors. And I do
no mean typos or the type of simplifications you could
expect in an introduction, but things that are plain
wrong.
Ciao,
--
FA
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
2:10 p.m.
On 15 March 2010 19:37, <fons(a)kokkinizita.net> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:42:50PM -0700, sevol
wrote:
I've never heard of this one, but I do know of another reference once
used by SAE:
http://johnlsayers.com/Recmanual/index.htm
--
GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
"The Multimedia Audio Course is a Sound
engineering course
adopted by audio schools. The online version is completely
free and under Creative Commons license."
I wouldn't recommend anyone paying for a 'school' using
that course. Or even not paying for it. Just 15 minutes
of cursory reading shows it is full of errors. And I do
no mean typos or the type of simplifications you could
expect in an introduction, but things that are plain
wrong.
3:58 p.m.
On 3/15/10, Ray Rashif <schivmeister(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 15 March 2010 19:37, <fons(a)kokkinizita.net>
wrote:
Ray,
Thanks for that. I'll have closer look as time allows.
-s
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:42:50PM -0700, sevol
wrote:
I've never heard of this one, but I do know of another reference once
used by SAE:
http://johnlsayers.com/Recmanual/index.htm
-- "The Multimedia Audio Course is a Sound
engineering course
adopted by audio schools. The online version is completely
free and under Creative Commons license."
I wouldn't recommend anyone paying for a 'school' using
that course. Or even not paying for it. Just 15 minutes
of cursory reading shows it is full of errors. And I do
no mean typos or the type of simplifications you could
expect in an introduction, but things that are plain
wrong.
2:17 p.m.
On 3/15/10, fons(a)kokkinizita.net <fons(a)kokkinizita.net> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:42:50PM -0700, sevol
wrote:
That's what I was a little afraid of. But I honestly don't have the
knowledge to judge the correctness of their info. I suppose I was
taken in by the Creative Commons licensing. :(
SoundOnSound & other sites have (I think) some decent articles. But I
guess I was thinking of the audiosonica site as a one-stop,
online-&-handy, reference. Does anyone know of a 'good' site that
covers the sort of material that audiosonica fails at?
Thanks for the insight Fons,
-s
"The Multimedia Audio Course is a Sound
engineering course
adopted by audio schools. The online version is completely
free and under Creative Commons license."
I wouldn't recommend anyone paying for a 'school' using
that course. Or even not paying for it. Just 15 minutes
of cursory reading shows it is full of errors. And I do
no mean typos or the type of simplifications you could
expect in an introduction, but things that are plain
wrong.
Ciao,
--
FA
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
_______________________________________________ 
2:29 p.m.
On Monday 15 March 2010 13:17:40 sevol wrote:
all the best,
drew
On 3/15/10, fons(a)kokkinizita.net
<fons(a)kokkinizita.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:42:50PM -0700, sevol wrote:
>> "The Multimedia Audio Course is a Sound engineering course
>> adopted by audio schools. The online version is completely
>> free and under Creative Commons license."
Which CC License? If a good one, couldn't fixes be sent along?
I wouldn't recommend anyone paying for a 'school' using
that course. Or even not paying for it. Just 15 minutes
of cursory reading shows it is full of errors. And I do
no mean typos or the type of simplifications you could
expect in an introduction, but things that are plain
wrong.
Ciao,
--
FA
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
_______________________________________________
That's what I was a little afraid of. But I honestly don't have the
knowledge to judge the correctness of their info. I suppose I was
taken in by the Creative Commons licensing. :(
SoundOnSound & other sites have (I think) some decent articles. But I
guess I was thinking of the audiosonica site as a one-stop,
online-&-handy, reference. Does anyone know of a 'good' site that
covers the sort of material that audiosonica fails at?
Thanks for the insight Fons,
-s
4:26 p.m.
On 3/15/10, drew Roberts <zotz(a)100jamz.com> wrote:
all the best,
drew
_______________________________________________
best to you,
-s
On Monday 15 March 2010 13:17:40 sevol wrote:
It says: Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Generic.
But understand, nobody in their right mind would want my fixes. O_o
On 3/15/10, fons(a)kokkinizita.net
<fons(a)kokkinizita.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:42:50PM -0700, sevol wrote:
>> "The Multimedia Audio Course is a Sound engineering course
>> adopted by audio schools. The online version is completely
>> free and under Creative Commons license."
Which CC License? If a good one, couldn't fixes be sent along?
I wouldn't recommend anyone paying for a 'school' using
that course. Or even not paying for it. Just 15 minutes
of cursory reading shows it is full of errors. And I do
no mean typos or the type of simplifications you could
expect in an introduction, but things that are plain
wrong.
Ciao,
--
FA
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
_______________________________________________
That's what I was a little afraid of. But I honestly don't have the
knowledge to judge the correctness of their info. I suppose I was
taken in by the Creative Commons licensing. :(
SoundOnSound & other sites have (I think) some decent articles. But I
guess I was thinking of the audiosonica site as a one-stop,
online-&-handy, reference. Does anyone know of a 'good' site that
covers the sort of material that audiosonica fails at?
Thanks for the insight Fons,
-s
16 Mar
16 Mar
10 a.m.
On Monday 15 March 2010 15:26:14 sevol wrote:
Not such a good one then.
Sure, no one would likely want mine either, but someone's fixes might improve
things.
all the best,
drew
Which CC
License? If a good one, couldn't fixes be sent along?
It says: Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Generic.
But understand, nobody in their right mind would want my fixes. O_o
2:53 p.m.
On 3/16/10, drew Roberts <zotz(a)100jamz.com> wrote:
On Monday 15 March 2010 15:26:14 sevol wrote:
Not such a good one then.
Sure, no one would likely want mine either, but someone's fixes might
improve
things.
all the best,
drew
_______________________________________________
Totally, I think at least the idea of the site has great
possibilities, & hopefully, the accuracy of info will get better as
time goes on.
As for the license, I think some of your comments from other threads
on LAU have made me more aware of all the variant CC licenses, but
generally it's not something I go out of my way to look at in much
detail. Perhaps I should more often.
thanks,
-s
Which CC
License? If a good one, couldn't fixes be sent along?
It says: Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Generic.
But understand, nobody in their right mind would want my fixes. O_o
5178
days inactive
5179
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
8 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
drew Roberts -
fons＠kokkinizita.net -
Ray Rashif -
sevol