6 May
2005
6 May
'05
5:31 p.m.
Can anyone tell me if it is still usefull to set up tmpfs on "/tmp" for
jack? Or am I still living in the dark ages?
Thanks
R~
6 May
6 May
6:14 p.m.
Russell Hanaghan wrote on Fri, 06-May-2005:
Can anyone tell me if it is still usefull to set up
tmpfs on "/tmp" for
jack? Or am I still living in the dark ages?
I think a lot of people and distributions are now building jack
with the --with-default-tmpdir=/dev/shm option because almost
all modern systems have that mounted on a tmpfs already. I believe
it is still important for reliable jack performance. What
the impact of not doing it is on recent kernels, I don't know.
jlc
6:59 p.m.
Jesse Chappell wrote:
Russell Hanaghan wrote on Fri, 06-May-2005:
Thnx Jesse.
I need to run some RT tests to compare...
Building some new test LiveCD's (Bootable with Thac's Audio packages)
and having the tmpfs enabled on /tmp creates a problem as that is where
the iso gets built.
Cheers,
R~
Can anyone tell me if it is still usefull to set
up tmpfs on "/tmp" for
jack? Or am I still living in the dark ages?
I think a lot of people and distributions are now building jack
with the --with-default-tmpdir=/dev/shm option because almost
all modern systems have that mounted on a tmpfs already. I believe
it is still important for reliable jack performance. What
the impact of not doing it is on recent kernels, I don't know.
jlc
6954
days inactive
6954
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Jesse Chappell -
Russell Hanaghan