16 May
2012
16 May
'12
5:34 p.m.
Just wondering what those who use Muse sequencer think of the beta 2.x
release versus 1.x for usability/stability...or would it be best to
stick with 1.x for actually getting projects done for now?
--
+ Brent A. Busby + "Some of them ate, some of them
+ Sr. UNIX Systems Admin + laughed, and some of them picked
+ University of Chicago + up a nine gallon can of paint at
+ James Franck Institute + Kmart for only $1.99."
18 May
18 May
12:37 p.m.
Hi Brent,
2012/5/16 Brent Busby <brent(a)keycorner.org>rg>:
Just wondering what those who use Muse sequencer think
of the beta 2.x
release versus 1.x for usability/stability...or would it be best to stick
with 1.x for actually getting projects done for now?
Being a bit biased as I'm part of MusE's dev team I would say that the
beta, or even better, the latest svn is much better than 1.1.
As you may know I dabble a bit with Using MusE also and it works very
good for me.
Still, do tell us if you encounter any problem.
Regards,
Robert
--
+ Brent A. Busby + "Some of them ate, some of them
+ Sr. UNIX Systems Admin + laughed, and some of them picked
+ University of Chicago + up a nine gallon can of paint at
+ James Franck Institute + Kmart for only $1.99."
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
12:47 p.m.
Hi Robert!
I've been following OOM with much interest although I've not got round to
trying the latest svn version of Muse yet to see where its parent project
is up to now in comparison - I will hopefully remedy that this weekend.
However, looking at the specs of Muse 2.0 there is one glaring omission -
no support for LV2!? Will the final release support audio and MIDI plugins
using the now stable LV2 spec or not?
Signed
FOSS plugin patrol UK
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Robert Jonsson <spamatica(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Brent,
2012/5/16 Brent Busby <brent(a)keycorner.org>rg>:
Just wondering what those who use Muse sequencer
think of the beta 2.x
release versus 1.x for usability/stability...or would it be best to stick
with 1.x for actually getting projects done for now?
Being a bit biased as I'm part of MusE's dev team I would say that the
beta, or even better, the latest svn is much better than 1.1.
As you may know I dabble a bit with Using MusE also and it works very
good for me.
Still, do tell us if you encounter any problem.
Regards,
Robert
--
+ Brent A. Busby + "Some of them ate, some of them
+ Sr. UNIX Systems Admin + laughed, and some of them picked
+ University of Chicago + up a nine gallon can of paint at
+ James Franck Institute + Kmart for only $1.99."
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
1:15 p.m.
Hi Dan,
2012/5/18 Dan MacDonald <allcoms(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hi Robert!
I've been following OOM with much interest although I've not got round to
trying the latest svn version of Muse yet to see where its parent project is
up to now in comparison - I will hopefully remedy that this weekend.
Please do :)
However, looking at the specs of Muse 2.0 there is one
glaring omission - no
support for LV2!? Will the final release support audio and MIDI plugins
using the now stable LV2 spec or not?
Indeed it's great that the spec is now in a stable state!
But sorry to say it will not be supported in 2.0, but it is coming,
probably in 2.1 later this year.
Regards,
Robert
Signed
FOSS plugin patrol UK
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Robert Jonsson <spamatica(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Brent,
2012/5/16 Brent Busby <brent(a)keycorner.org>rg>:
Just wondering what those who use Muse sequencer
think of the beta 2.x
release versus 1.x for usability/stability...or would it be best to
stick
with 1.x for actually getting projects done for now?
Being a bit biased as I'm part of MusE's dev team I would say that the
beta, or even better, the latest svn is much better than 1.1.
As you may know I dabble a bit with Using MusE also and it works very
good for me.
Still, do tell us if you encounter any problem.
Regards,
Robert
--
+ Brent A. Busby + "Some of them ate, some of them
+ Sr. UNIX Systems Admin + laughed, and some of them picked
+ University of Chicago + up a nine gallon can of paint at
+ James Franck Institute + Kmart for only $1.99."
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user 
1:17 p.m.
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Robert Jonsson <spamatica(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Being a bit biased as I'm part of MusE's dev
team I would say that the
beta, or even better, the latest svn is much better than 1.1.
As you may know I dabble a bit with Using MusE also and it works very
good for me.
I've used the Muse2 beta a bit, but not yet for any actual real
projects yet (mainly use Rosegarden & Ardour/MixBus), but it's a good
app with a lot of good features and easy to use interface. I am going
to use it for my next big project to see how well it holds up.
--
Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.brettwmccoy.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it,
it would overturn the world."
-- Jelaleddin Rumi
4551
days inactive
4553
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Brent Busby -
Brett McCoy -
Dan MacDonald -
Robert Jonsson