7 Mar
2008
7 Mar
'08
9:36 a.m.
Greetings:
I've corrected and updated another page at linux-sound.org:
http://linux-sound.org/distro.html
Please advise if you know of other distributions and/or larger-scale
package maintainers (a la Thac or Planet CCRMA) that should be listed.
Sites utilizing this page may want to update their lists.
Best,
dp
8 Mar
8 Mar
2:59 a.m.
Dave Phillips wrote:
Greetings:
I've corrected and updated another page at linux-sound.org:
http://linux-sound.org/distro.html
Please advise if you know of other distributions and/or larger-scale
package maintainers (a la Thac or Planet CCRMA) that should be listed.
If you're listing Dynebolic (which is spelled "dyne:bolic", isn't it?),
you should also list puredyne - <https://devel.goto10.org/puredyne>.
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
9:21 a.m.
david wrote:
If you're listing Dynebolic (which is spelled
"dyne:bolic", isn't it?),
you should also list puredyne - <https://devel.goto10.org/puredyne>.
Well, the logo doesn't contain the colon, so if the Web site is
inconsistent, so shall I be. :)
I've added pure:dyne (with the colon) per your suggestion. Thanks for
the heads-up !
Best,
dp
9 Mar
9 Mar
1:23 a.m.
Dave Phillips wrote:
david wrote:
The CLICK_ME.HTM file on the Dynebolic CD I have here spells it as
"dyne:bolic". Outside of their logo, they spell it dyne:bolic on their site.
If you're listing Dynebolic (which is spelled
"dyne:bolic", isn't
it?), you should also list puredyne -
<https://devel.goto10.org/puredyne>.
Well, the logo doesn't contain the colon, so if the Web site is
inconsistent, so shall I be. :) I've added pure:dyne (with the colon) per your
suggestion. Thanks for
the heads-up !
You're welcome! Cool.
Back when I first ran into those two distros, the main difference was
pure:bolic used a RT kernel, the other didn't. I guess it's now called
puredyne.
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
8 Mar
8 Mar
11:34 a.m.
Dave Phillips wrote:
Greetings:
I've corrected and updated another page at linux-sound.org:
http://linux-sound.org/distro.html
Please advise if you know of other distributions and/or larger-scale
package maintainers (a la Thac or Planet CCRMA) that should be listed.
Sites utilizing this page may want to update their lists.
Best,
dp
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
There 's also a repository for pro-audio software for ArchLinux, as
described here:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ProAudio
Perhaps worth adding, if someone using arch is searching for an audio
distribution :-)
6:13 p.m.
What about these distros?
http://www.mypclinuxos.com/doku.php/produceredition
http://rocxshop.com
Ubuntu Studio Replacements? Heheh...
6176
days inactive
6178
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Christian Delahousse -
Dave Phillips -
david -
Holger Ballweg