31 Mar
2010
31 Mar
'10
8:47 a.m.
Hey Hey Hey!
I'm currently making a rather big grand piano sample library. It is a
Yamaha C5 recorded with 2 AKG C414 in an AB position about 10cm above
the strings at 24bit48khz. It is downsampled to 16bit44.1khz because
gigedit couldn't save files larger than 2gb. It's sampled in minor
thirds with 17 velocity layers (some only 16 due to a nasty head ache
when I recorded)
I'd like to have some feedback and have two questions answered. I've
posted the same question on the linuxsampler forum but that doesn't seem
to be the most active place in the world so I'll make a post here too.
The question: Can I make release samples to be played even if the
sustain pedal is pressed?
The other question: How should I distribute it? I was thinking something
like a torrent would be the most effective. I only got 512kbps up and
It's about 1.5gb worth of .gig file
The Demo: http://j.imagehost.org/download/0912/GrandPianoUpdatedDemo
Played by Alfonso Gugliucci, User PianistItaliano on youtube.
Linuxsampler forum thread:
http://bb.linuxsampler.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=474&start=0&sid=…
Thank you!
31 Mar
31 Mar
10:55 a.m.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:42 AM, alexander <axeldenstore(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Hey Hey!
I'm currently making a rather big grand piano sample library. It is a
Yamaha C5 recorded with 2 AKG C414 in an AB position about 10cm above
the strings at 24bit48khz. It is downsampled to 16bit44.1khz because
gigedit couldn't save files larger than 2gb. It's sampled in minor
thirds with 17 velocity layers (some only 16 due to a nasty head ache
when I recorded)
I'd like to have some feedback and have two questions answered. I've
posted the same question on the linuxsampler forum but that doesn't seem
to be the most active place in the world so I'll make a post here too.
The question: Can I make release samples to be played even if the
sustain pedal is pressed?
The other question: How should I distribute it? I was thinking something
like a torrent would be the most effective. I only got 512kbps up and
It's about 1.5gb worth of .gig file
The Demo: http://j.imagehost.org/download/0912/GrandPianoUpdatedDemo
Played by Alfonso Gugliucci, User PianistItaliano on youtube.
Linuxsampler forum thread:
http://bb.linuxsampler.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=474&start=0&sid=…
Thank you!
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Interesting question. I suspect you'll have an easier time getting
your first question answered at someplace like Northern Sounds.
http://www.northernsounds.com/forum/index.php?&Itemid=28
Torrents are good once they are seeded. Until then it just takes time.
HTH,
Mark
11:45 a.m.
The piano sounds very nice indeed.
The other question: How should I distribute it? I was thinking something
like a torrent would be the most effective. I only got
512kbps up and
It's about 1.5gb worth of .gig file
Archive.org is the place that comes to my mind. If you can't do it yourself,
I could upload it for you. You send me a DVD with the file and I do the
uploading.
A few things here:
- I am not sure of the upload limit of Archive.org.
- To keep you as the author, you could create an account on archive.org,
pass me the details, then I upload the file, then you change the password.
Just a thought.
Viktor
11:45 a.m.
alexander wrote:
Hey Hey Hey!
I'm currently making a rather big grand piano sample library. It is a
Yamaha C5 recorded with 2 AKG C414 in an AB position about 10cm above
the strings at 24bit48khz. It is downsampled to 16bit44.1khz because
gigedit couldn't save files larger than 2gb. It's sampled in minor
thirds with 17 velocity layers (some only 16 due to a nasty head ache
when I recorded)
I'd like to have some feedback and have two questions answered. I've
posted the same question on the linuxsampler forum but that doesn't seem
to be the most active place in the world so I'll make a post here too.
The question: Can I make release samples to be played even if the
sustain pedal is pressed?
The other question: How should I distribute it? I was thinking something
like a torrent would be the most effective. I only got 512kbps up and
It's about 1.5gb worth of .gig file
The Demo: http://j.imagehost.org/download/0912/GrandPianoUpdatedDemo
Played by Alfonso Gugliucci, User PianistItaliano on youtube.
Sounds really nice!
By the way, why do you want to have release samples with the sustain
pedal pressed? Surely that's not very "realistic"?
James
12:23 p.m.
On 03/31/2010 04:45 PM, James Stone wrote:
alexander wrote:
Because the hammers are moving up and down even tho the sustain pedal is
pressed. It's not a necessity.. I just thought it would be fun to test
and try.
As for distributing, I can upload it myself, just give me space :) btw,
should I try to compress it?
Hey Hey Hey!
I'm currently making a rather big grand piano sample library. It is a
Yamaha C5 recorded with 2 AKG C414 in an AB position about 10cm above
the strings at 24bit48khz. It is downsampled to 16bit44.1khz because
gigedit couldn't save files larger than 2gb. It's sampled in minor
thirds with 17 velocity layers (some only 16 due to a nasty head ache
when I recorded)
I'd like to have some feedback and have two questions answered. I've
posted the same question on the linuxsampler forum but that doesn't seem
to be the most active place in the world so I'll make a post here too.
The question: Can I make release samples to be played even if the
sustain pedal is pressed?
The other question: How should I distribute it? I was thinking something
like a torrent would be the most effective. I only got 512kbps up and
It's about 1.5gb worth of .gig file
The Demo: http://j.imagehost.org/download/0912/GrandPianoUpdatedDemo
Played by Alfonso Gugliucci, User PianistItaliano on youtube.
Sounds really nice!
By the way, why do you want to have release samples with the sustain
pedal pressed? Surely that's not very "realistic"?
James
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
12:29 p.m.
On 31 March 2010 at 17:18, alexander <axeldenstore(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way, why do you want to have release
samples with the sustain
> pedal pressed? Surely that's not very "realistic"?
If you do, then FLAC or Wavepack are lossless alternatives for
Linux users. FLAC is Open Source. Wavepack is free, but I'm not
sure about its licensing issues, if any.
--
Kevin
1:57 p.m.
Excerpts from Kevin Cosgrove's message of 2010-03-31 16:29:17 +0200:
On 31 March 2010 at 17:18, alexander <axeldenstore(a)gmail.com> wrote:
wavpack is BSD licensed, it's just not as well known as flac.
wavpack does support 32bit float while flac doesn't afaik, and there are
some more differences but it may not matter in this case. Both are
lossless and free.
Philipp
> By the way, why do you want to have release
samples with the sustain
> pedal pressed? Surely that's not very "realistic"?
If you do, then FLAC or Wavepack are lossless alternatives for
Linux users. FLAC is Open Source. Wavepack is free, but I'm not
sure about its licensing issues, if any.
2:04 p.m.
On 31 March 2010 at 17:57, Philipp <hollunder(a)lavabit.com> wrote:
wavpack is BSD licensed, it's just not as well
known as flac.
wavpack does support 32bit float while flac doesn't afaik, and
there are some more differences but it may not matter in this
case. Both are lossless and free.
Does this help?
http://flac.sourceforge.net/faq.html#general__samples
--
Kevin
2:21 p.m.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:04:10AM -0700, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
On 31 March 2010 at 17:57, Philipp <hollunder(a)lavabit.com> wrote:
i know, that flac only compresses .wav
its a .gig file.
not sure if wavpack compresses arbitrary binaries.
--
torben Hohn
wavpack is BSD licensed, it's just not as
well known as flac.
wavpack does support 32bit float while flac doesn't afaik, and
there are some more differences but it may not matter in this
case. Both are lossless and free.
Does this help?
http://flac.sourceforge.net/faq.html#general__samples 
5:08 p.m.
On Wednesday 31 March 2010, at 18.22.55, torbenh <torbenh(a)gmx.de> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:04:10AM -0700, Kevin
Cosgrove wrote:
Since it's loss-less, does it really have to care what it's compressing? Seems
easy enough to just provide "raw audio" support, where the user tells it what
sample format to expect.
Anyway, 'man flac' speaks of various options for raw files and
encoding/decoding from/to stdin/stdout, so it does seem like there would be
ways of using it on any sort of files... Haven't tried it, though. :-)
--
//David Olofson - Developer, Artist, Open Source Advocate
.--- Games, examples, libraries, scripting, sound, music, graphics ---.
| http://olofson.net http://kobodeluxe.com http://audiality.org |
| http://eel.olofson.net http://zeespace.net http://reologica.se |
'---------------------------------------------------------------------'
On 31 March 2010 at 17:57, Philipp
<hollunder(a)lavabit.com> wrote:
i know, that flac only compresses .wav
its a .gig file. wavpack is BSD licensed, it's just not as
well known as flac.
wavpack does support 32bit float while flac doesn't afaik, and
there are some more differences but it may not matter in this
case. Both are lossless and free.
Does this help?
http://flac.sourceforge.net/faq.html#general__samples
7:28 p.m.
Excerpts from torbenh's message of 2010-03-31 18:22:55 +0200:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:04:10AM -0700, Kevin
Cosgrove wrote:
Well, wavpack is also designed for lossless audio. If the whole .gig is
compressed as such then I'd use a generic format, maybe .xz aka. lzma2.
wavpack only has 'raw-pcm' options which obviously refer to pcm data.
I don't know how .gig works and whether the samples and the
meta-information can be split/joined easily. Probably not worth the
trouble.
On 31 March 2010 at 17:57, Philipp <hollunder(a)lavabit.com> wrote:
i know, that flac only compresses .wav
its a .gig file.
not sure if wavpack compresses arbitrary binaries. wavpack is BSD licensed, it's just not as
well known as flac.
wavpack does support 32bit float while flac doesn't afaik, and
there are some more differences but it may not matter in this
case. Both are lossless and free.
Does this help?
http://flac.sourceforge.net/faq.html#general__samples
7:49 p.m.
On 04/01/2010 12:28 AM, Philipp wrote:
Excerpts from torbenh's message of 2010-03-31
18:22:55 +0200:
That's more what I was thinking, bzip or lzma, How well supported are
these on windows or osx? I haven't used win for 6 years or so..
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:04:10AM -0700, Kevin
Cosgrove wrote:
Well, wavpack is also designed for lossless audio. If the whole .gig is
compressed as such then I'd use a generic format, maybe .xz aka. lzma2.
wavpack only has 'raw-pcm' options which obviously refer to pcm data.
I don't know how .gig works and whether the samples and the
meta-information can be split/joined easily. Probably not worth the
trouble.
On 31 March 2010 at 17:57,
Philipp<hollunder(a)lavabit.com> wrote:
i know, that flac only compresses .wav
its a .gig file.
not sure if wavpack compresses arbitrary binaries.
wavpack is BSD licensed, it's just not as
well known as flac.
wavpack does support 32bit float while flac doesn't afaik, and
there are some more differences but it may not matter in this
case. Both are lossless and free.
Does this help?
http://flac.sourceforge.net/faq.html#general__samples
8:12 p.m.
Excerpts from alexander's message of 2010-03-31 23:44:27 +0200:
On 04/01/2010 12:28 AM, Philipp wrote:
I think this is the best bet for windows and OSX is mentioned there as
well. I think .7z and .xz isn't the same, and .xz is certainly quite
new. .7z isn't that common on linux.
It's kind of hard to say what to use.. most compatible would be .zip I
think, .xz might offer the best compression ratio and .bz2 is somewhere
in between, supported by 7zip and winrar (both common on windows in my
experience). I don't know about OSX.
Since only betas of 7zip come with .xz support I'd go with .bzip2 and
maybe compare to .zip to see whether it's worth it.
Excerpts from torbenh's message of 2010-03-31
18:22:55 +0200:
That's more what I was thinking, bzip or lzma, How well supported are
these on windows or osx? I haven't used win for 6 years or so.. On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:04:10AM -0700, Kevin
Cosgrove wrote:
Well, wavpack is also designed for lossless audio. If the whole .gig is
compressed as such then I'd use a generic format, maybe .xz aka. lzma2.
wavpack only has 'raw-pcm' options which obviously refer to pcm data.
I don't know how .gig works and whether the samples and the
meta-information can be split/joined easily. Probably not worth the
trouble.
On 31 March 2010 at 17:57,
Philipp<hollunder(a)lavabit.com> wrote:
> wavpack is BSD licensed, it's just not as well known as flac.
> wavpack does support 32bit float while flac doesn't afaik, and
> there are some more differences but it may not matter in this
> case. Both are lossless and free.
>
Does this help?
http://flac.sourceforge.net/faq.html#general__samples
i know, that flac only compresses .wav
its a .gig file.
not sure if wavpack compresses arbitrary binaries.
2 Apr
2 Apr
3:20 p.m.
On 01/04/2010, Philipp <hollunder(a)lavabit.com> wrote:
Excerpts from alexander's message of 2010-03-31
23:44:27 +0200:
Zip is totally useless - it can't really compress if matched against
the latest archiving tools.
A cross-platform (and the best next to lzma) solution would be RAR,
but you may not like its licensing implications.
.xz and .7z may not be the same (compressed vs. archived?), but the
7zip client is able to uncompress .xz from beta version onwards. Linux
users can unpack anything, so in the end I don't see why you couldn't
just go .7z and hjsplit/lxsplit the result to 4 parts to be even more
friendly.
--
GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
On 04/01/2010 12:28 AM, Philipp wrote:
I think this is the best bet for windows and OSX is mentioned there as
well. I think .7z and .xz isn't the same, and .xz is certainly quite
new. .7z isn't that common on linux.
It's kind of hard to say what to use.. most compatible would be .zip I
think, .xz might offer the best compression ratio and .bz2 is somewhere
in between, supported by 7zip and winrar (both common on windows in my
experience). I don't know about OSX.
Since only betas of 7zip come with .xz support I'd go with .bzip2 and
maybe compare to .zip to see whether it's worth it. Excerpts from torbenh's message of 2010-03-31
18:22:55 +0200:
That's more what I was thinking, bzip or lzma, How well supported are
these on windows or osx? I haven't used win for 6 years or so.. On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:04:10AM -0700, Kevin
Cosgrove wrote:
> On 31 March 2010 at 17:57, Philipp<hollunder(a)lavabit.com> wrote:
>
>
>> wavpack is BSD licensed, it's just not as well known as flac.
>> wavpack does support 32bit float while flac doesn't afaik, and
>> there are some more differences but it may not matter in this
>> case. Both are lossless and free.
>>
> Does this help?
>
> http://flac.sourceforge.net/faq.html#general__samples
>
i know, that flac only compresses .wav
its a .gig file.
not sure if wavpack compresses arbitrary binaries.
Well, wavpack is also designed for lossless audio. If the whole .gig is
compressed as such then I'd use a generic format, maybe .xz aka. lzma2.
wavpack only has 'raw-pcm' options which obviously refer to pcm data.
I don't know how .gig works and whether the samples and the
meta-information can be split/joined easily. Probably not worth the
trouble.
1 Apr
1 Apr
11:41 a.m.
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 11:57:21 Philipp wrote:
Excerpts from Kevin Cosgrove's message of
2010-03-31 16:29:17 +0200:
Link showing the license:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wavpack/develop
Not sure why I could not find that info here:
http://www.wavpack.com/
On 31 March 2010 at 17:18, alexander
<axeldenstore(a)gmail.com> wrote:
wavpack is BSD licensed, it's just not as well known as flac.
wavpack does support 32bit float while flac doesn't afaik, and there are
some more differences but it may not matter in this case. Both are
lossless and free. > By the way, why do you want to have release
samples with the sustain
> pedal pressed? Surely that's not very "realistic"?
If you do, then FLAC or Wavepack are lossless alternatives for
Linux users. FLAC is Open Source. Wavepack is free, but I'm not
sure about its licensing issues, if any.
Philipp
drew
11:47 a.m.
Excerpts from drew Roberts's message of 2010-04-01 15:41:10 +0200:
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 11:57:21 Philipp wrote:
I really don't know. Try '/' or 'f' and type 'bsd' and
you'll find it.
Excerpts from Kevin Cosgrove's message of
2010-03-31 16:29:17 +0200:
Link showing the license:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wavpack/develop
Not sure why I could not find that info here:
http://www.wavpack.com/
On 31 March 2010 at 17:18, alexander
<axeldenstore(a)gmail.com> wrote:
wavpack is BSD licensed, it's just not as well known as flac.
wavpack does support 32bit float while flac doesn't afaik, and there are
some more differences but it may not matter in this case. Both are
lossless and free. > By the way, why do you want to have release
samples with the sustain
> pedal pressed? Surely that's not very "realistic"?
If you do, then FLAC or Wavepack are lossless alternatives for
Linux users. FLAC is Open Source. Wavepack is free, but I'm not
sure about its licensing issues, if any.
Philipp
drew
12:34 p.m.
On Thursday 01 April 2010 09:47:24 Philipp wrote:
Excerpts from drew Roberts's message of 2010-04-01
15:41:10 +0200:
Don't know just what was wrong with me there but it is obvious... Thanks.
drew
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 11:57:21 Philipp
wrote:
I really don't know. Try '/' or 'f' and type 'bsd' and
you'll find it. Excerpts from Kevin Cosgrove's message of
2010-03-31 16:29:17 +0200:
Link showing the license:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wavpack/develop
Not sure why I could not find that info here:
http://www.wavpack.com/
On 31 March 2010 at 17:18, alexander
<axeldenstore(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > By the way, why do you want to have release samples with the
> > sustain pedal pressed? Surely that's not very "realistic"?
If you do, then FLAC or Wavepack are lossless alternatives for
Linux users. FLAC is Open Source. Wavepack is free, but I'm not
sure about its licensing issues, if any.
wavpack is BSD licensed, it's just not as well known as flac.
wavpack does support 32bit float while flac doesn't afaik, and there
are some more differences but it may not matter in this case. Both are
lossless and free. Philipp
drew
3 Apr
3 Apr
4:41 p.m.
Ok, so I've recut _everything_ this time in ardour :) I now got proper
fades on everything I've also done some fine per sample filtering and
got rid of a fair bit of noise. I also have an ardour session with all
500 samples on 30 different tracks so now I can color them as I wish
with little effort :).
Here's what it sounds like now, if you crank the volume you should
really hear the difference.
http://j.imagehost.org/download/0191/GrandPianoUpdate3
4:48 p.m.
Hi Alexander, great job!!!! It's really good, can't wait to be able to
use it. Sound great.
regards
Tez@
.......................................................................................
Le 03/04/2010 20:36, alexander a écrit :
Ok, so I've recut _everything_ this time in ardour
:) I now got proper
fades on everything I've also done some fine per sample filtering and
got rid of a fair bit of noise. I also have an ardour session with all
500 samples on 30 different tracks so now I can color them as I wish
with little effort :).
Here's what it sounds like now, if you crank the volume you should
really hear the difference.
http://j.imagehost.org/download/0191/GrandPianoUpdate3
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
5:03 p.m.
On 04/03/2010 09:47 PM, teza wrote:
Hi Alexander, great job!!!! It's really good,
can't wait to be able to
use it. Sound great.
regards
Tez@
.......................................................................................
Le 03/04/2010 20:36, alexander a écrit :
> Ok, so I've recut _everything_ this time in ardour :) I now got proper
> fades on everything I've also done some fine per sample filtering and
> got rid of a fair bit of noise. I also have an ardour session with all
> 500 samples on 30 different tracks so now I can color them as I wish
> with little effort :).
>
> Here's what it sounds like now, if you crank the volume you should
> really hear the difference.
>
> http://j.imagehost.org/download/0191/GrandPianoUpdate3
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
Well thank you :) I expect to release it in a couple of days. Oh, and I
forgot to mention, I've managed to crank it up to 24bit48khz :) I landed
on 1.8gb. Read last post here to learn how:
http://bb.linuxsampler.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=474&p=3005&sid=2…
6:13 p.m.
If you happen to need bandwidth to host the file, we'll gladly host it on
download.linuxaudio.org.
Best wishes,
Ico
7:43 p.m.
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic <ico(a)vt.edu> wrote:
If you happen to need bandwidth to host the file,
we'll gladly host it on download.linuxaudio.org.
And we, as gnufunk.org collective, can host a mirror or a bittorrent
permanent seed
let me know
ciao
--
cb
10:30 p.m.
On 03.04.2010 20:36, alexander wrote:
Ok, so I've recut _everything_ this time in ardour
:) I now got proper
fades on everything I've also done some fine per sample filtering and
got rid of a fair bit of noise. I also have an ardour session with all
500 samples on 30 different tracks so now I can color them as I wish
with little effort :).
Here's what it sounds like now, if you crank the volume you should
really hear the difference.
http://j.imagehost.org/download/0191/GrandPianoUpdate3
Finally, a very nice and free (as in freedom :)) piano sample pack.
Really really great work! Thank you for this!
Waiting to try it out... :)
Igor
4 Apr
4 Apr
4:16 a.m.
alexander wrote:
Ok, so I've recut _everything_ this time in ardour
:) I now got proper
fades on everything I've also done some fine per sample filtering and
got rid of a fair bit of noise. I also have an ardour session with all
500 samples on 30 different tracks so now I can color them as I wish
with little effort :).
Here's what it sounds like now, if you crank the volume you should
really hear the difference.
http://j.imagehost.org/download/0191/GrandPianoUpdate3
Sounds lovely! Can't wait for the release :)
Thanks
Leigh
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
31 Mar
31 Mar
7:50 p.m.
Hi,
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:42:58 alexander wrote:
I'm currently making a rather big grand piano
sample library. It is a
Yamaha C5 recorded with 2 AKG C414 in an AB position about 10cm above
the strings at 24bit48khz. It is downsampled to 16bit44.1khz because
gigedit couldn't save files larger than 2gb. It's sampled in minor
thirds with 17 velocity layers (some only 16 due to a nasty head ache
when I recorded)
I haven't actually listened to the demo yet, but:
- Can we convince you of going 48kHz/24bits? That is far more common in audio
production. Using 44.1kHz in a setup running at 48kHz includes possibly nasty
artefacts from up-sampling and a loss of precision and frequencies. Down-
sampling is far easier on the quality...
Maybe its better to make do with one or two layers less. And maybe help to
fix gigedit. linuxsampler is said to be able to do more then 2GB files.
- When looking for compression for easier distribution: What about
distributing a "source" archive that contains the wavpack/flac compressed raw
samples, the gigedit file and a makefile for creation of the .gig-file?
Have fun,
Arnold
8:48 p.m.
On 04/01/2010 12:50 AM, Arnold Krille wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:42:58 alexander wrote:
Hmm, how's that for a version 2.0? :) I haven't noticed any up-sampling
problems yet. But I do agree, 24bit48khz would be much more fun. I would
have to cut 3 layers at least, we're talking about shaving 0.6gb's here :)
I think I'll just shove it down a bz2 archive..
I'm currently making a rather big grand piano
sample library. It is a
Yamaha C5 recorded with 2 AKG C414 in an AB position about 10cm above
the strings at 24bit48khz. It is downsampled to 16bit44.1khz because
gigedit couldn't save files larger than 2gb. It's sampled in minor
thirds with 17 velocity layers (some only 16 due to a nasty head ache
when I recorded)
I haven't actually listened to the demo yet, but:
- Can we convince you of going 48kHz/24bits? That is far more common in audio
production. Using 44.1kHz in a setup running at 48kHz includes possibly nasty
artefacts from up-sampling and a loss of precision and frequencies. Down-
sampling is far easier on the quality...
Maybe its better to make do with one or two layers less. And maybe help to
fix gigedit. linuxsampler is said to be able to do more then 2GB files.
- When looking for compression for easier distribution: What about
distributing a "source" archive that contains the wavpack/flac compressed raw
samples, the gigedit file and a makefile for creation of the .gig-file?
Have fun,
Arnold
1 Apr
1 Apr
6:28 a.m.
Excerpts from alexander's message of 2010-04-01 00:43:20 +0200:
On 04/01/2010 12:50 AM, Arnold Krille wrote:
Did you have contact with the gigedit authors? Maybe the fix is minor.
It would be a pity if the quality would suffer from something that could
be fixed easily.
Hi,
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:42:58 alexander wrote:
Hmm, how's that for a version 2.0? :) I haven't noticed any
up-sampling
problems yet. But I do agree, 24bit48khz would be much more fun. I would
have to cut 3 layers at least, we're talking about shaving 0.6gb's here :)
I think I'll just shove it down a bz2 archive.. I'm currently making a rather big grand piano
sample library. It is a
Yamaha C5 recorded with 2 AKG C414 in an AB position about 10cm above
the strings at 24bit48khz. It is downsampled to 16bit44.1khz because
gigedit couldn't save files larger than 2gb. It's sampled in minor
thirds with 17 velocity layers (some only 16 due to a nasty head ache
when I recorded)
I haven't actually listened to the demo yet, but:
- Can we convince you of going 48kHz/24bits? That is far more common in audio
production. Using 44.1kHz in a setup running at 48kHz includes possibly nasty
artefacts from up-sampling and a loss of precision and frequencies. Down-
sampling is far easier on the quality...
Maybe its better to make do with one or two layers less. And maybe help to
fix gigedit. linuxsampler is said to be able to do more then 2GB files.
- When looking for compression for easier distribution: What about
distributing a "source" archive that contains the wavpack/flac compressed raw
samples, the gigedit file and a makefile for creation of the .gig-file?
Have fun,
Arnold
15 Apr
15 Apr
10:51 a.m.
I hate to say it but it will take a little bit of time still before I
release it. I've decided to use the sfz format instead. It seems much more
flexible than giga and gigedit started to missbehave and pissed me right off
when I tried to make releases :) sfz is non-monolithic so you'll
automatically have access to individual samples.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:42 PM, alexander <axeldenstore(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Hey Hey!
I'm currently making a rather big grand piano sample library. It is a
Yamaha C5 recorded with 2 AKG C414 in an AB position about 10cm above the
strings at 24bit48khz. It is downsampled to 16bit44.1khz because gigedit
couldn't save files larger than 2gb. It's sampled in minor thirds with 17
velocity layers (some only 16 due to a nasty head ache when I recorded)
I'd like to have some feedback and have two questions answered. I've posted
the same question on the linuxsampler forum but that doesn't seem to be the
most active place in the world so I'll make a post here too.
The question: Can I make release samples to be played even if the sustain
pedal is pressed?
The other question: How should I distribute it? I was thinking something
like a torrent would be the most effective. I only got 512kbps up and It's
about 1.5gb worth of .gig file
The Demo: http://j.imagehost.org/download/0912/GrandPianoUpdatedDemoPlayed by Alfonso
Gugliucci, User PianistItaliano on youtube.
Linuxsampler forum thread:
http://bb.linuxsampler.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=474&start=0&sid=…
Thank you!
5338
days inactive
5353
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
27 comments
16 participants
participants (16)
-
alexander -
Arnold Krille -
becks -
David Olofson -
drew Roberts -
Igor Brkic -
Ivica Ico Bukvic -
James Stone -
Kevin Cosgrove -
Leigh Dyer -
Mark Knecht -
Philipp -
Ray Rashif -
teza -
torbenh -
Viktor Mastoridis